AMR-103-0120 · Complete counterexample; classification by gauge group

A Conjecture of Guadagnini and Pilo on Quantum Invariants and the Fundamental Group: Counterexamples and a Classification by Gauge Group

Manuscript 4 October 2026 · Online 4 October 2026

math.GTmath.QAUnrefereed preprint

Abstract

Guadagnini and Pilo conjectured that for a closed oriented 3-manifold \(M\) and a compact gauge group \(G\) the absolute value of the quantum invariant \(\tau^G_r(M)\), when it does not vanish, depends only on the fundamental group of \(M\); this is Conjecture 7.5 of Ohtsuki's problem list. They proved it for lens spaces and \(G=\mathrm{SU}(2)\). We show that the conjecture is false in general. With \(\tau(S^3)=1\): for \(\mathrm{SU}(4)\) and \(r=12\) the lens spaces \(L(8,1)\) and \(L(8,3)\) have \(|\tau|=16+8\sqrt3\) and \(56+32\sqrt3\); for \(\mathrm{SU}(5)\) and \(r=10\) one has \(|\tau(L(5,1))|^2\)\({}=3475+1550\sqrt5\) and \(|\tau(L(5,2))|\)\({}=45+20\sqrt5\); for \(\mathrm{Spin}(7)\) and \(r=15\) the moduli for \(L(10,1)\) and \(L(10,3)\) are nonzero with ratio \(2-\sqrt3\). These values are obtained by exact computation from the Reshetikhin–Turaev surgery formula. On the basis of the lens space formula of Hansen and Takata we then determine the simply connected compact simple groups for which the conjecture holds. We prove a structure result for the lattice Gauss sums in that formula: only a coset of a stabilizer in the Weyl group contributes. From it we deduce that the lens-space statement fails for \(\mathrm{SU}(N)\) for every \(N\ge4\), for \(\mathrm{Spin}(m)\) with \(m=7\) and every \(m\ge9\), and for \(E_6\), \(E_7\), \(E_8\), and that it holds for \(\mathrm{Sp}(2n)\) for every \(n\ge1\) and for \(\mathrm{SU}(3)\), \(G_2\), \(\mathrm{Spin}(8)\) and \(F_4\) (for the last two with a computer-assisted lemma). By geometrization the conjecture for \(G\) is equivalent to its lens-space case, so, given that formula, it holds exactly for \(\mathrm{SU}(2)\), \(\mathrm{SU}(3)\), \(\mathrm{Sp}(2n)\), \(G_2\), \(\mathrm{Spin}(8)\) and \(F_4\). We also record that two closed formulas of Guadagnini and Pilo for \(\mathrm{SU}(2)\) are inaccurate; their conclusion is not affected. This is an unrefereed note.

Record

Affiliation
Mercury Software GmbH
Result
Complete counterexample; classification by gauge group
Categories
math.GT · math.QA
Manuscript
4 October 2026
Online release
4 October 2026
Version
1.0
License
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Files and verification

The PDF is the canonical reading copy. The source archive contains the LaTeX manuscript, bibliography, reproducibility material, and audit documents without build artefacts.

Citation

Alper Ferudun, “A Conjecture of Guadagnini and Pilo on Quantum Invariants and the Fundamental Group: Counterexamples and a Classification by Gauge Group,” EulerSolve Research Papers, AMR-103-0120, 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23138144.

BibTeX
@misc{Ferudun2026Amr1030120,
  author = {Ferudun, Alper},
  title = {A Conjecture of Guadagnini and Pilo on Quantum Invariants and the Fundamental Group: Counterexamples and a Classification by Gauge Group},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {EulerSolve Research Papers},
  url = {https://eulersolve.org/papers/amr-103-0120/},
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23138144},
  note = {AMR-103-0120; unrefereed preprint}
}

More research papers

Show all 135 other papers

All 136 research papers →