{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "problem_number": "ARXIV-2606.18462",
  "title": "Exact 6-cut rigidity and small-order superconnectivity for the 6-regular case of Dirac's k=4 problem",
  "author": {
    "name": "Alper Ferudun",
    "affiliation": "Mercury Software GmbH",
    "url": "https://github.com/AlperTheKing"
  },
  "abstract": "Dirac asked in 1970 whether for every k ≥ 4 there is a k-vertex-critical graph without critical edges; Jensen settled all k ≥ 5, and only k = 4 remains open. Following Skottová and Steiner, call a graph G a (4,1)-graph if χ(G) = 4, χ(G − v) = 3 for every vertex v, and χ(G − e) = 4 for every edge e; they proved δ(G) ≥ 6 and λ(G) ≥ 6 for every (4,1)-graph and asked whether a 6-regular (4,1)-graph exists. We prove three results about this 6-regular case. Theorem A (computational): there is no 6-regular 4-vertex-critical graph on n ≤ 15 vertices, except for a unique graph (up to isomorphism) on n = 13, whose 13 critical edges form a Hamilton cycle; hence any 6-regular (4,1)-graph has at least 16 vertices. Theorem B: in a 6-regular (4,1)-graph every 6-edge-cut is either the edge star of a vertex or has both shores of size at least 15; consequently every 6-regular (4,1)-graph on at most 29 vertices is super-6-edge-connected. Theorem C (all sizes): no shore of a nontrivial 6-edge-cut in a 6-regular (4,1)-graph induces a bipartite graph; more generally, a shore whose deficiency is concentrated on two vertices forces them to receive equal colours in every proper 3-colouring. The proof of Theorem B rests on an exact classification of the 3×3 cut matrices of 6-edge-cuts in (4,1)-graphs (exactly 21 matrices, five types up to row/column permutations) together with a boundary-shortfall lemma; the unique near-miss is K_{3,3,3} minus a rainbow 3-matching. Several supporting lemmas are machine-checked in Lean 4/Mathlib.",
  "result_type": "COMPLETE_SCOPED_PROOF",
  "categories": [
    "math.CO"
  ],
  "keywords": [
    "Dirac problem",
    "vertex-critical graphs",
    "critical edges",
    "(4,1)-graphs",
    "6-regular graphs",
    "edge cuts",
    "superconnectivity",
    "Lean 4"
  ],
  "manuscript_version_date": "2026-06-16",
  "publication_date": "2026-06-16",
  "publication_date_kind": "arXiv announcement of v1",
  "version": "v1",
  "date_modified": "2026-06-16",
  "presentation_revision_only": false,
  "status": "preprint on arXiv",
  "canonical_url": "https://eulersolve.org/papers/arxiv-2606-18462/",
  "pdf_url": "https://eulersolve.org/papers/arxiv-2606-18462/paper.pdf?v=9d63315b519e",
  "doi": "10.48550/arXiv.2606.18462",
  "zenodo_record_url": null,
  "arxiv_id": "2606.18462",
  "arxiv_version": "v1",
  "arxiv_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18462",
  "arxiv_primary_category": "math.CO",
  "arxiv_comment": "9 pages. Ancillary files: C++/Python code, per-graph certificates, and Lean 4/Mathlib sources",
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "scope_caveat": "Three results on the 6-regular case of Dirac's k=4 problem (Skottova-Steiner (4,1)-graphs): Theorem A (computational) excludes 6-regular 4-vertex-critical graphs on at most 15 vertices except one graph on 13 vertices, so a 6-regular (4,1)-graph has at least 16 vertices; Theorem B (6-cut rigidity; super-6-edge-connectivity up to 29 vertices); Theorem C (no bipartite shore of a nontrivial 6-edge-cut). Whether a 6-regular (4,1)-graph exists, and Dirac's k=4 problem itself, remain open.",
  "files": {
    "paper.pdf": {
      "sha256": "9d63315b519ed3ec8f09e3fc76c71467bacb56e547b01cdbcc0630b7471372c7"
    },
    "source.zip": {
      "sha256": "8ca61a342a2f88f4457db7477dfb0c2099d34cd126a7c6a332b15ee43a0099f8"
    }
  },
  "ai_use_disclosure": "AI-assisted tools supported research, computation, proof development, and manuscript preparation. The author remains responsible for all claims and the final text."
}